Compare
PromptLeash and built-in vendor usage dashboards.
Most AI products include a usage dashboard for that product. It helps you administer licences and see activity. PromptLeash adds the context leaders need to judge whether AI is improving the work.
Side by side
Where the two differ.
| Built-in vendor usage dashboards | PromptLeash | |
|---|---|---|
| Working across tools | Usage within that vendor's own product. | Activity across any AI source you approve, read in one place. |
| Role and workflow context | Seats, prompts, tokens and model calls, usually by user or licence. | Activity interpreted using your organisation's roles and workflows. |
| Where it runs | Inside the vendor's own service. | PromptLeash is deployed inside your environment, works under your security standards and has no external dependencies. No telemetry, no usage data and no interaction content leaves your environment or reaches PromptLeash. |
| Proficiency | Activity counts, which rarely show whether AI is changing the work that matters. | Proficiency in the context of each role, read against role potential and your own prior periods. |
Together
Use them together.
Vendor dashboards remain useful for licence administration and product settings.
Vendor dashboards show activity for one product. PromptLeash adds role and workflow context, maintained classification models, proficiency analysis and spend across every approved source. This helps teams act on what they see in decisions about investment, training and how work is done.
See the difference with your own sources.
Book a demo to discuss your priorities and see the current product. We then agree which data sources, roles and workflows are relevant, complete your security review, and deploy inside your environment.